Nidal Hasan’s crime was horrific. In 2009 he murdered thirteen soldiers at Fort Hood. Nothing can excuse this. I’m not going to get into the death penalty debate. I’ll just observe that actions have consequences.
Having said this, why should Hasan’s firing squad execution be televised, as the Secretary of Defense plans? Does he think this will deter those who would consider similar actions? There’s virtually no evidence that the death penalty does this. (Those who are on such a dangerous edge likely won’t tune in to the death sentence broadcast anyway.) It is just some kind of a public muscle-flexing? I don’t think it’s going to convince anyone that we’re “tough”, unless it’s the Defense Secretary himself. Is it just to underscore that consequences exist for law-breaking? That just shines the light on our inconsistency. We want to watch Nidal Hasan pay for his crimes, but we’ll look the other way when innocent people die because ICE agents made a “mistake.” We want to make sure there’s justice for the Fort Hood victims, but we want to forget about the innocent school girls our military killed in Iran. We call for books to be banned for violent content, but we’ll pull up a chair and pop popcorn to watch a violent execution in realtime.
I don’t see any reason for this to happen, but that’s not what troubles me most. Public executions rarely end up on the right side of history. Making this a public spectacular just has the uneasy odor of a lynching to me.
In addition, I believe it is an act of weakness. In the first century, the Roman Empire built a practice of public crucifixions. Mostly this was a form of execution for those who allegedly dared to defy the power of Rome. Crucifixion was meant to be a threat and a warning to all who would oppose the Empire. The phenomenon parallels the first evidences that the Roman Empire had hit its apex and was beginning its decline. So, in a way, the practice of public crucifixions exposed the beginning decay of the Empire. Rather than being a display of strength, it was an indicator of growing weakness. I’m afraid the normalizing of public, punitive actions will indicate the same for the United States.
The Secretary of Defense claims allegiance to Jesus the Christ. What is remotely Christ-like about this? I don’t want to hear a bunch of cherry-picked Old Testament scriptures. I mean measured by the greatest commandment to love God and love others, measured by the risen Lordship of the one who died on one of those Roman crosses, and measured by the mandate to make disciples of all peoples, how will this act embody the one who humbled himself for our salvation?
I’ll wait…
I’ll see you around the next bend in the river.